|
Introduction to the Government Information Factory (GIF)
The Government Information Factory is a framework for planning the architecture to support the information needs of a government agency.
The GIF is a framework for planning the architecture to support the information needs of a government agency. The GIF is shaped by many factors including the need to:
Every agency has a large charter that needs to be satisfied by its information architecture and the GIF is the framework to satisfy the mandates of the charter. The following figure shows the GIF:
The GIF is not designed to be built all at once. Even the richest, most sophisticated agency builds its GIF a component at a time. Indeed, in many agencies, the GIF will never be completed. Instead the GIF may have parts constructed for one agency that are not needed in another agency. Some of the differences between agencies that lend themselves to a different interpretation of the GIF include:
Despite these differences in implementation, the GIF is designed to serve all the information needs of all the agencies. It becomes useful even where there is not an initial information processing need. By implementing the GIF, a future need can be correctly positioned within the overall technological architecture, and it becomes the road map into the future for the informational needs of the agency. Different components of the GIF can be considered “major” or cornerstone elements. The figure below outlines these cornerstone components:
These cornerstone components are:
There are other components of the GIF that are important in their own way. However, the components that are listed here are those that hold most of the data and do most of the processing. DEVELOPING THE COMPONENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION FACTORY The different components of the GIF have very different characteristics. These characteristics differ widely in terms of:
Because there are vast differences in these characteristics, it is not surprising that there are different development methodologies that can be used to build them. These are:
The parts of the GIF that are subject to the SDLC waterfall methodology are those parts that are repetitive and predictable in nature. The detailed activities of operational applications, the web activities, and the activities passing through the global ODS are all full of repetitive, predictable processes and therefore there is a need to use the SDLC approach to systems development. The spiral development approach is also applicable to the development of components of the GIF and is most useful in the development of:
The spiral development approach works best where only partial requirements are known and where development results are desired very quickly. Occasionally, some of the operational applications can be built under the spiral development approach as well. Still other parts of the GIF are best built under the heuristic development approach. In particular, the components which lend themselves to this approach include:
The ideal order in which organizations should build the components of the GIF would show that there are two entry points. The classical entry point is that of the operational applications. Once the operational applications are built, then the data warehouse is built. After the data warehouse is built, one can build the ODS, data marts, the project marts, the DSS applications, and the exploration warehouse/data mining facility. After the data warehouse is built and large amounts of data are stored, the alternative storage facility and the integrated archival facility can be constructed. The other entry point to the building of the GIF is to start with the web environment. In this case, the web environment is built and then the web data flows into the data warehouse. In many ways the building of the government information factory is like the building of a city. A city is built from a plan over many years. There are many complex and expensive components to building a city, each of which rises and falls on its own merits. There are financial, residential, municipal, and recreational districts. There are plans for houses, buildings, parks, etc., all within the city plan. The city plan may take years to fulfill or, in some cases, the city plan may never be fulfilled entirely. But the existence of the city plan and its fulfillment proves its worth from the very first day of its adoption. A city plan varies from a house plan in many respects. A city plan usually requires components which may never exist. A house plan requires all the components to exist. You don’t build a house without electricity and a bathroom, for example. A city plan may take years to complete. A house plan generally has a finite time for completion. A city is paid for by all of its citizens and legal entities who reside in it. A house is paid for by its occupants. The GIF then is like a city plan and the specifications for an application, whereas, the data warehouse is more comparable to the plans for a house or an office building. When there is disagreement between two or more informational processes, such as in a cube found in a data mart and in a report coming from a DSS application, the data warehouse provides a foundation to determine why there is a difference. But the data in the data warehouse serves another very important function. Once the data warehouse has been built and is in place, the data in the data warehouse can be accessed and can be used to build a new data mart or DSS application quickly. The data warehouse sets the stage for a rapid development process in that once the infrastructure is built; it is immediately available for other purposes. For these very important reasons – reconcilability of information and speed of development, the data warehouse becomes the hub of existence of the GIF. Recent articles by Bill Inmon
Bill Inmon -
Bill is universally recognized as the father of the data warehouse. He has more than 36 years of database technology management experience and data warehouse design expertise. He has published more than 40 books and 1,000 articles on data warehousing and data management, and his books have been translated into nine languages. He is known globally for his data warehouse development seminars and has been a keynote speaker for many major computing associations. Bill can be reached at 303-681-6772. Editor's note: More Bill Inmon articles, resources, news and events are available in the Business Intelligence Network's Bill Inmon Channel. Be sure to visit today! |